Evolution of corruption in the PA since the PLC elections. * Poverty level. Crosstabulation
% within Poverty level.
		Poverty level.			Total
		Hardship cases	Below the poverty line	Above the poverty line	Total
Evolution of corruption in the PA since the PLC elections.	Increased	43.7%	36.8%	30.6%	37.5%
	Decreased	30.7%	31.6%	43.4%	34.9%
	Remained the same	25.6%	31.6%	26.0%	27.6%
Total		100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
	Value	df	Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square	12.421(a)	4	.014
Likelihood Ratio	12.208	4	.016
Linear-by-Linear Association	3.218	1	.073
N of Valid Cases	627
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 53.25.

Evolution of corruption in the PA since the PLC elections. * Region of residence. Crosstabulation
% within Region of residence.
		Region of residence.		Total
		West Bank	Gaza Strip	Total
Evolution of corruption in the PA since the PLC elections.	Increased	36.5%	39.1%	37.6%
	Decreased	32.9%	39.1%	35.5%
	Remained the same	30.6%	21.8%	27.0%
Total		100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Chi-Square Tests
	Value	df	Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square	6.634(a)	2	.036
Likelihood Ratio	6.731	2	.035
Linear-by-Linear Association	3.286	1	.070
N of Valid Cases	660
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 73.09.