|
|
| Age. | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 72 | 73 | 76 | 80 | 81 | |||
| Is the Caretaker government proceeding on the right path? | Yes | 60.0% | 50.0% | 53.3% | 35.7% | 45.5% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 77.8% | 46.2% | 37.5% | 71.4% | 58.3% | 75.0% | 75.0% | 100.0% | 87.5% | 91.7% | 40.0% | 58.3% | 62.5% | 100.0% | 42.9% | 37.5% | 58.3% | 100.0% | 72.7% | 66.7% | 25.0% | 46.7% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 60.0% | 80.0% | 75.0% | 66.7% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 55.9% | ||||||
| No | 100.0% | 40.0% | 50.0% | 46.7% | 64.3% | 54.5% | 66.7% | 75.0% | 22.2% | 53.8% | 62.5% | 28.6% | 41.7% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 12.5% | 8.3% | 60.0% | 41.7% | 37.5% | 57.1% | 62.5% | 41.7% | 27.3% | 33.3% | 75.0% | 53.3% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 40.0% | 20.0% | 100.0% | 25.0% | 33.3% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 57.1% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 44.1% | ||||||||
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson Chi-Square | 68.863(a) | 51 | .048 |
| Likelihood Ratio | 83.263 | 51 | .003 |
| Linear-by-Linear Association | 1.000 | 1 | .317 |
| N of Valid Cases | 383 | ||
| a 74 cells (71.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .44. | |||