|
|
|
|
|
| Age. | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 67 | 71 | 73 | 76 | 80 | 81 | |||
| Poverty all. | Below the poverty level | 100.0% | 50.0% | 83.3% | 68.2% | 71.4% | 66.7% | 72.7% | 84.6% | 92.3% | 55.6% | 61.5% | 25.0% | 57.1% | 84.6% | 40.0% | 44.4% | 40.0% | 62.5% | 58.3% | 66.7% | 58.3% | 60.0% | 57.1% | 100.0% | 75.0% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 75.0% | 81.8% | 50.0% | 56.3% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 80.0% | 50.0% | 84.6% | 40.0% | 80.0% | 60.0% | 100.0% | 75.0% | 100.0% | 75.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 68.6% | ||
| Above the poverty level | 50.0% | 16.7% | 31.8% | 28.6% | 33.3% | 27.3% | 15.4% | 7.7% | 44.4% | 38.5% | 75.0% | 42.9% | 15.4% | 60.0% | 55.6% | 60.0% | 37.5% | 41.7% | 33.3% | 41.7% | 40.0% | 42.9% | 25.0% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 18.2% | 50.0% | 43.8% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 20.0% | 50.0% | 15.4% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 31.4% | |||||||||||||||
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson Chi-Square | 55.845(a) | 53 | .368 |
| Likelihood Ratio | 66.333 | 53 | .103 |
| Linear-by-Linear Association | 2.310 | 1 | .129 |
| N of Valid Cases | 414 | ||
| a 80 cells (74.1%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .31. | |||