Poverty level before the elections | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardship cases | Below the poverty line | Above the poverty line | |||
Since the last municipal elections, would you say that | The delivery of local services in general improved | 28.2% | 29.9% | 25.1% | 27.4% |
The delivery of local services generally worsened | 22.0% | 23.4% | 23.8% | 23.2% | |
The delivery of services generally remained the same | 49.8% | 46.7% | 51.2% | 49.4% | |
Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
---|---|---|---|
Pearson Chi-Square | 2.775(a) | 4 | .596 |
Likelihood Ratio | 2.784 | 4 | .595 |
Linear-by-Linear Association | .829 | 1 | .363 |
N of Valid Cases | 1042 | ||
a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 56.90. |