|
|
|
|
|
| Poverty Level (August 2006) | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardship cases | Below the poverty line | Above the poverty line | |||
| Since the last municipal elections, would you say that | The delivery of local services in general improved | 28.9% | 26.4% | 27.2% | 27.6% |
| The delivery of local services generally worsened | 25.7% | 24.9% | 16.7% | 22.7% | |
| The delivery of services generally remained the same | 45.3% | 48.7% | 56.2% | 49.7% | |
| Total | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Value | df | Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson Chi-Square | 12.395(a) | 4 | .015 |
| Likelihood Ratio | 12.779 | 4 | .012 |
| Linear-by-Linear Association | 3.946 | 1 | .047 |
| N of Valid Cases | 1069 | ||
| a 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 73.65. | |||